TOPIC SERIES

Leak testing & acceptance

What helium testing and pressure-rise testing each measure, how to read them, and what belongs in an acceptance record.

2 articles in this series

When a chamber will not pump down, two causes must be separated first: leakage and outgassing. They are treated differently and judged by different criteria, and confusing them leads to the wrong conclusion. This series covers method selection, how to read the numbers, and which numbers are defensible in an acceptance document.

What this series covers

  • The pressure-rise method measures leakage plus outgassing together; it suits process checks and coarse localisation, not standalone acceptance.
  • Helium mass-spectrometer testing is performed in the 1×10⁻⁹ Pa·m³/s range, with the exact criterion and test points agreed on the project drawing.
  • Readings taken hot, under load, or after process has run are not comparable: leak testing is done unloaded.
  • A record without instrument model, tracer gas, duration and temperature cannot be reproduced or audited.

FAQ

Can pressure-rise testing replace helium leak testing?

Not as an acceptance criterion. It measures leakage and outgassing together and cannot separate them; only on a well-baked system where outgassing is negligible does the rise rate approach the true leak rate. Its value is that it is cheap, repeatable on site, and quickly locates gross leaks.

At which stage of fabrication should leak testing be done?

A coarse test after welding locates defects early; the final test follows assembly and precedes cleanliness processing. Testing only at the end means a failure requires disassembling already-clean parts, repeating both cleaning and prior labour.

Request a QuoteBack to Articles

WhatsApp us